Progression Review
Progression reviews document student progress and support decisions. The review process tracks two types of information:
Timeline & Evidence (Past)
Records of support and formal notifications:
- Development meetings — prove support was offered
- Warnings issued — prove formal notification of risk
- Follow-up meetings — document continued support
- Decision meetings — document student hearing
- Student acknowledgments — student confirmed receipt of warning
- Counselor referrals — referral when personal circumstances claimed
- Deferral notifications — opschorting approval when applicable
Improvement Plan & Actions (Future)
Planned work the student must undertake:
- Planned meetings — visible to student
- Submit assignment — visible to student
- Improve score target — visible to student
- Counselor appointment — visible to student
- Internal coordinator tasks — hidden from student by default (use visibility toggle to reveal)
Decision Flow
Progression reviews follow a three-stage process:
- Mentor Recommendation — mentor submits recommendation (positive / negative / defer)
- Committee Review — coordinator/admin reviews evidence and prepares decision
- Final Decision — binding decision issued with appeal window
Key Requirements
Before a negative decision, the system checks:
- ✓ Warning issued
- ✓ Development meeting held
- ✓ Student informed
- ✓ Decision meeting completed
- ✓ Deferral eligibility checked
Each institution can configure these requirements based on local policy.
- Add examencommissie role as first-class role
Do not touch ILS-dev until this design is confirmed.